- #Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr update
- #Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr upgrade
- #Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr iso
#Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr iso
I'll take all the dynamic range I can get (although the D800 is arguably a little cleaner in the ISO 200-mid-range). Given that for sharpness you shouldn't be at f/8 or below anyway if you can avoid it, it's not nearly as unusable as some would claim - the majority of my images are at ISO 64, either because I've got sunlight available or because I'm using a fast aperture to hide an ugly indoor background.
#Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr update
5fps at full resolution and 6fps at a 25MP 1.2x crop is a detectable update from 4 and 5fps respectably (the D800 felt like a stills-only camera, although I did use it for the occasional sporting event the D810 felt like a general-purpose camera, whereas the D850 - which can do full resolution at 9fps with a grip - feels capable of actual action shots).The D810 feels like a faster camera in interactions.
#Nikon d810s vs canon full frame dslr upgrade
Edited Apby ben_hutchersonįWIW, I did upgrade my D800e to a D810 (and traded in my D700 to do it, having found that I never used it any more and the swapped +/- buttons were driving me nuts whenever I did image review). In the past, I've used a D700 for the same task again because the files aren't too large. The files are easy to handle, its high ISO performance doesn't really matter under studio lighting, and I like its color rendition.
It's an oddball sensor that Fuji called 12mp but some call 6mp(and both definitions are technically true). Most of my photos intended to be posted directly online are actually shot on a Fuji Finepix S5. I certainly understand the "too big" aspect. I can understand that, but let me approach the question a bit differently-Īs things are now, it makes sense to me to pay the extra for a D810 over a D800 if buying used(when I bought my D800, they were still reliably north of $1K and D810s were still the current model).ĭid your friend, however, go from a D800 to a D850 and then circle back to a D810? He found the 45.7 megapixels inconvenient for some applications. If I had a $1000 burning a hole in my pocket and were in your situation, I'd choose the D810.Īctually, a friend bought an 850 then circled back and bought an 810 also.
On the other hand, you can add those too a D500/D800/D810 and not have to carry the extra weight around with you. It has the little joysticks that I've come to really appreciate on the D500, and of course you have a the vertical grip/vertical release. The D4 does handle like a single digit D camera, and it's hard to replicate that. The D810 is somewhat more leisurely and only moves at 7fps in DX crop mode with a battery grip. In fact, a D810 is in my semi-short-term plan(unless I can swing the cash for a D850).īoth the D4 and D500 run at 10fps, so there's no real compelling case for one over the other if that spec is important to you(although the D4 can edge the D500 out slightly at 11fps in DX crop mode). By itself, no one change would make a compelling case to replace it, but added together all of those little things make a compelling case for an upgrade. The D810 is basically a massaged version of the D800. The AF on my D500 constantly amazes me, and it's fast and sure even with normally slow focusing lenses like the 300mm f/4(screwdriver) and basically instantaneous with good AF-S lenses like my 70-200 f/2.8 VR. Your D500 has the same AF system as the D5, which is newer and better than the D4. The D810 has the same sensor you're comfortable with in the D800, but without an AA filter so it's a tiny bit sharper The D4 sensor is at least 1 stop better than the D3, and might well be one of the best low light sensors Nikon has ever put into a camera I also have a Df, which has the D4 sensor.įor me, the choice would come down to which camera you use more, and what specifically you're looking for in a camera: I have neither, but like you have a D500 and a D800, along with a D3s.
0 kommentar(er)
